Tuesday 23 December 2008

Crush the Bus!

Every Barcelona fan nightmare, a game against a defensive wall, where the opponent play that new tactical structure only implemented to face Barcelona Fc, the 9-1-0, and if its more adventurous it turns to 8-1-1. Alright, not literally, but you know what I mean.dubai

Guardiola was aware of this issue since the moment he was hired; the first thing he called for was a big, ok I mean REALLY BIG Striker! A giant in the box! He wouldn’t care about the striker technical abilities when it comes to dribbling three players in a millisecond; he already has the Argentinean wizard for that, who is much more than enough. Guardiola wanted a Skyscraper!

Now, According to Wikipedia list of tallest buildings and structures in the world, “Burj Dubai” is heading the list (under construction); the total budget for the 707 m height building is about $4.1 billion. Which means that, every 1 meter slice of it costs around 5,800,000 $, I will get to the point, patience.

Don’t get so shocked by the crazy cost of the project… If we take in consideration the two meters (more or less) strikers Barcelona had on their short list, and the price demanded for them, you can easily conclude that Barcelona had to pay for a tall striker, relatively, four times the cost of the tallest and most luxurious building in the world including all what you can imagine to find in that luxury Building.

PLAN CANCELED AND NO REGRET!!!!

Still let’s not fool ourselves; being reasonable has a tax as well. Every time we play against a “Two Rows” Defense, we will get stressed till we hunt the first Goal, and then LET THE SHOW BEGINS! But that’s not the worst news, What’s more stressing is that this scenario will not happen every once and while, but every time our guys run out of the tunnel to play a game, they will be the ones to kick the ball for the game to start, because the other team will not have enough players the midfield to do so, all cemented back.

We believe that the tall striker would have been an added Value in that manner. Yet, there is a reasonable question to ask about the original plan aiming to switch Eto’o for a Skyscraper; will the Skyscraper win us more games than Eto’o?

Knowing that it’s too late to seek answers for that, that’s a question for transfer periods, and we will discuss it soon, so for now I think the most fruitful question is: Can Eto’o plus the systematic group offense, cover up for the lack of “Skyscraper striker” model? Or is it a problem to live with, but not to solve?

In my opinion, that’s not a mission impossible, I believe there are three interrelated methods we can Apply to solve the “Two Rows” defense problem, and unlock the game, if it worked, then we will know we just earned the impact we were welling to pay crazy to get, without selling our best striker, and most importantly without changing our offense style, because that skyscraper will definitely has a bad impact on the fluid Offense we play and enjoy.

Through what I will mention below I will not be inventing anything, but I will try to apply what is considered as “Alphabetic of football” using the hefty resources we have in our squad.

1. Total football

Guardiola is injecting this system in the tactical structure in doses. Total football is not just to switch positions, but also to have that “Water- like” structure, that reshape itself based on the opponent resistance, sometimes its 4-3-3, with two wings and a striker, then in one second it turn to become 4-3-1-2 where Messi play the free role behind two strikers – Henry-Eto’o, then its 4-1-2-2-1 with Messi moving to play as a striker with Henry and Eto’o Behind, without ignoring Alves contribution going forward and the way his runs reshape the tactical structures we draw on papers.

This approach shake any Defense, no doubt, because the way you set your defense to stop Eto’o in the box will not work if you face Messi instead, or even both. Monitoring Xavi as a sole playmaker turn useless when Messi Move to play that role as well, and so on.

We can really count on this Strategy, especially against teams that apply Tie Man-to-Man Marking. But we all wish if it was that easy, right?

In modern football, the man marking is a “Last option”, because every coach expect that key players switch positions, so everyone is applying a Zone marking now, you mark the player closest to your territory, what’s more boring is that, actually some coaches tend not to apply any kind of man marking at all, they simple close their area creating a crowd, closing any spaces to their box regardless of how the opponent move, and here, the total football –as mentioned above- lose lot of its advantages.

2. Let the sky rain crosses to the box:

One of the standard options: no need to penetrate with the ball, instead of being a fighter sniping your target, act as a bomber and rain the opponent box by crosses and one of the balls will hit target. But to do that efficiently, you need the right players in the box, having only Eto’o there, means you are actually sending greeting cards for the opponent defense to enjoy, let’s shake and redistribute our cards then!

The receipt for this plan is to have good flanks to cross the ball, and players with physical presence in the box to knock it in, so let’s move the shorts back and the monsters forward, I mean Xavi move to play the pivot role, while Yaya move to play on the edge of the box, not permanently because then we will lose the power of surprise, let it happen every time the team switch from total football to crossing set up.

Two critical comments will face this suggestion:

1- Xavi is the best Play maker in the world and you want to pull him out of the operation Zone?! And the answer is simple, I believe being outside the crowd will make it easier for Xavi to dictate the system, whenever there is a big mess just play the ball back to the unmarked Xavi and let him generate a new wave forward. The other respond is that I am aiming to create a “Two Poles” playmaking this way, Xavi out and Messi in, instead of having them both on the edge of the box closing more space than the crowd-y defense already sealing. Why not? Lets have Xavi out – Military operation usually work from outside the battlefield for a reason- and Messi do a playmaking role upward where his skills can help him to dribble, make a Mess, and earning fouls for Alves on the edge of the Area.

2- The second Critic will be, Yaya is better as a defensive midfielder than Xavi, but I wonder if the opponents can cause more threat than Xavi plus three Defenders behind can handle, and still being crowded in their Box. I just can’t see that happening.

So making this switch means having enough depth and potentials defensively to slow down counter attacks, plus having two distinct playmakers which will increase the fluidity of the ball, and we will also gain a 191 cm guy on the edge of the box who will only need milliseconds to penetrate and head the cross to the net.

One monster rolling to the box is not enough to seal the deal, the movement of Eto’o in the box is important dragging them to the near post opening a gap, and also one other player movement is important based on who will be the forward beside Eto’O and Messi, and who will be the third Midfielder beside Xavi and Yaya.

To cover the options without making the article long, I think the following presentations will serve the need:

(Click the image to enlarge)

(Click the image to enlarge)

I cant say the first selection is better or the second one, It depend on whom we are playing against, their weakness and strength.

3. Let the wind bomb shots to the box:

In short, we have three missiles launchers in this team, Yaya, keita, and Alves. The trick to switch permanently from “Crossing Method” to “Shooting set up” is Messi switching positions with Alves who run to the edge of the box through the path created by Messi sprint wide to the right dragging his markers.

This set up will create a lot of confusion for the opponent, they know the three players are there to shoot, and with the physical characters of the shooting players, it will not be enough for the opponent to apply one-to-one Marking, Alves is too explosive for any one marker to handle when he run, cross or shoot, while Yaya hm…you know…! But at the same time parking more than three players to face the three threats will definitely create gaps on the sides for Messi and Iniesta/Henry to penetrate to the box through the flanks.

This set up inspire lot of predicted scenarios, starting from a fake shot attempt and playing an assist instead to Eto’o in the box, but mostly to the guys penetrating from the flanks behind defense, to the scenario of penetrating to the box with the ball (at least Yaya and Alves can do so), while Eto’o move out pulling Central backs out of position, and much more.

It will only work as a Mix!

As I mentioned from the start, one method alone will be too predictable to be efficient, switching from one set up to another during the match force opponent to surrender, but lets clarify one thing, its not easy to reach that level of understanding, lot of training needed, lot of tactical lectures, and lot of concentration and mental awareness.


Ramzi Tanani


25 comments:

Marcus said...

Just great tactical set-ups. Kind of my way of thinking but deeper.

Keep up the good work! Everbody... Pep, Ramzi and all other I don't remember right now.

Anonymous said...

Nice Christmas present by Ramzi. Thanks!
Merry Christmas to everyone!

Anonymous said...

You are a genius, Ramzi! :)

Anonymous said...

loool
i think i know who the next barcelona coach is.;)
fantastic tactics ramzi but im not sure about (let the sky rain crosses) it's not like barca
and so far the only players who managed to get a header at the goal are puyol(assist) - pique(missed) - keita (2goals) and messi (and id bet my life that it will never happen again for him)
anyway thanks for all your hard work
enjoy the holiday

Anonymous said...

i don't like the idea of the defensive mid(whether it be yaya or keita) leaving his spot right behind the back four but that's just me. sure he'd be great for set plays and pique would be too but i don't think that should be the strategy for the whole game.
good article though ramzi ; )

kamikaze kontiki said...

Glad to have these analyses ramzi but I couldn't quite figure out any substantial difference b/w option 2.1 and 2.2. A centre and back movement for Xavi is a great idea. This will also create more space for Messi.
and i have a couple of points.
1. we are set up only to cross from the right and the left flank is only being used to create space. but the moment the ball moves over to the right the opposing left back is no longer going to stay stuck to the left flank rather he is going to move in to help deal with the cross. At the same time it doesn't make sense for our left forward to remain out wide rather he (especially if it is Henry) should be challenging for the cross. this means there are 3 players already in the box challenging for the cross without the (unneccesary) addition of Toure. I think Eto'o, Henry and Guddy/Kieta challenging for a cross is something most coaches will be satisfied with.
2. Setting up for the outside shot with options u suggested also seems unlikely to work with 8 defenders covering a small area around the top the box.
For me a major problem during the Classico was henry starting his run from close in. (Imagine the situation with the ball in the centre 15 yards from the penalty area and at Xavi's feet)Having the left fwd start out from wider will leave more space in the middle. Remember that both Messi and Eto'o are very special players. Eto'o is distinct from other strikers because of sudden quick movements which allow him to create a yard of space for a shot. More space for Eto'o in the centre will allow him to create a one on one with a defender in 1 sq metre of space. :) ok, i guess u can see that i am angling for the probing intricate game rather than one where we set up for crosses or long shots.

Waleed said...

very nice read, Ramzi as expected.
I can say that we are now somewhere advanced in the first method, we started to imply the second one “from which we scored two decisive goals against Getafe and villa real", but we haven't yet launched the third method effectively which is really important and gives a lot of the solutions, and we have all the resources to make it work, I would add Busquets to your list of rocket launchers, although I've seen him shooting from a long range only twice "the first was in the preseason and it hit the cross bar and the second was saved rather brilliantly by Lopez, Villa real Keeper" i can say that he has what it takes to join the group, Alves is trying his best and i'm sure he'll score one of his laser beam shots soon ,apart from free kicks he scored already! Kieta needs time to master his role in tactical terms first before he start trying his luck! but in general the lads seem more reluctant to shoot from the edge of the box as they always prefer to enjoy the passing carnival! even when shooting seems a more effective solution. Tore’ looks very shy on both shooting and heading crosses, would anyone tell this guy that he is a giant and no defender will dare to share a header with him? Anyway it’s obvious that he is only following the boss rules!

p.s. I really like your animations, the lads look cool moving this way ;)

Anonymous said...

An excellent analysis Ramzi. Should forward this piece of analysis to Guardiola.

Ramzi said...

If anyone had any problems while opening the post, sent us a note about it, with the changes made on the Articles features your feedback is important if images didn't load, or slow loading or anything.

Glad you enjoy your reading, Some good points are raised already and for first fast responds on some:

hamad_ali: The Cross shower is not "like Barcelona" this is why it is a choice when the other team make it impossible for Barcelona to play the way we like. As I mentioned, lets score the first goal then the show begin. The lack of finishing in crosses in my opinion is because we are still working on a set up for it (something similar at least to whati mentioned), if you notice all the names u mentioned aside of Keita made their impact in set pieces not in a normal play, with only Eto'o in the box without specific target move for cross set up thats what you get - lack of goals from crosses.

miguel:Xavi already played in the pivot role and Yaya played before more forward with monaco so Both will not feel it strange to make this move, regarding Keita he is already playing forward, not as a DM.

kamikaze kontiki: the difference between the two scenarios is that in the first one iniesta play as a midfielder and Henry forward, then when the team attack Henry cut inside to the post and Iniesta move to the wing so you get two guys running to the two posts to push the defense back opening a gap for a Tall Yaya in the box to make a run. while in the second you have kieta and yaya running to the box from midfield while iniesta play on the wing. it depend on the other team weakness and strength to decide which option is better, I may explain further in other comment though.
Now regarding the fact that when one wing has the ball to cross the other wing will not be active wide, actualy his importance then is that he pull one more player at least to his flank making it less crowdy in the box and it will create more spaces there which is the reason why teams implement such tactics, regarding Yaya, he is 191 cm and i just cant handle keeping him standing in the midfield while we are despiser for a target man in the box.
For the Shooting option, usually crowded box serve as an advantage when a shot is taken, their will be more possibility for the ball to hit a player, deflect and change its direction fooling the keeper, now if you mean the crowdy defense will pressure forward to prevent the players from shooting, again, its another advantage because it either earn us fouls on the edge of the box from nonsense panicked tackles or open the space behind for the players I set on the sides of the box to penetrate and instead of shooting a tricky pass will be played to the box and believe me most of the time that either make you score or earn u a penalty now that the defenders are caught be surprise.

Waleed:Regarding animations, its a shame that the server do not allow Flash, then u will like it more;)

I am aware lot of things need to be clarified in the post, but again it will turn to become too long and we don't want that;)
But i think this way discussions will be more interesting and some may explain some advantages that i never thought about while others will light on disadvantages i didn't notice, at the end discussions is a sport for the mind;)

Anony, do you know his number? :))

kamikaze kontiki said...

But ramzi, its normal practice for all wingbacks to move in when the cross is coming in from the opposite flank n help deal with it. A forward on the opposite flank no longer contributes an immediate threat for him. Besides if the opposition gains possession of the ball with both the 3rd midfielder n Yaya sucked in we will be left with Xavi having to deal with a horde of breaking midfielders who might choose to pass n run with the ball (building up speed as they near the defense)rather than just long ball it.
The 3rd fwd is anyway available at the far post, Eto'o near post and 3rd midfielder running in, Messi at the edge of the penalty area to latch onto deflections.
Also the long shot I just cannot accept encouraging. for me, this means surrendering possession. Taking a long shot is something which requires a certain amount of time and space simply because the player has to set himself, take a higher back lift and a look at goal. With 2 lines of defence facing them we are unlikely to get this much time or space. Also as a player sets himself for a long shot he puts himself of-balance in a manner from which it is difficult to recover and regain control so he has to either complete the shot or make a pass and again with 2 defensive lines before this will lead more often to squandering of possession than a breakthrough pass.

Ramzi said...

kamikaze kontiki, I understand what you mean, but we must imagine the ball movement to figure out how players screen to each other, switch positions, change the style from "Total football" based on the standard tactics, to "Crossing set up" to "shooting set up" for the other team to handle all the changes mentioned and redistribute the players to guard the different keys of threat for each structure, they need chips in their brains so they get controlled by a stick in their coach hand, so its not a Rigid structure as may seen on the first glance.
The methods mentioned are more like plug ins and updated to the Barcelona style and not something to take its place.
If all that will be blocked by defense then i am not sure if without it we will have a better chance.
When I made the animation, I tried to show who cross the ball and who wait it in the box and around, so while Alves cross iniesta will not be opening that wide, he will be on the left of course but more near the left corner edge of the box, so if defense headed the ball away u will have Messi and Xavi further in the center, Iniesta on their left and Alves on their right.
In football you seek possession to play, you don't play to guard possession, at the end you need to make attempts either penetrating with the ball, or passing the ball to the box or cross it or take a shot, so you need to keep all your choices opened, any attempt you do may either earn you a goal or make you lose possession or if the players are distributed well you earn possession again, regarding Counter attacks I described my respond on that in the article, against 10 men behind the ball, Xavi plus 2 defenders plus fast transition are more than enough for me to feel secured.
With the kind of muscles Yaya, Alves and Keita have and the new techniques applied in youth football academies, shooting does not take as much time as you may expect anymore.
But you have a strong points though, so if I became a coach I hope you will not be the coach I play against:)

Anonymous said...

Love it. I've always said crosses are the way to beat the bus

...but what I really love is the 8 ft tall Yaya and the 4 ft tall Eto'o and Messi.

nice vids!

kamikaze kontiki said...

Ramzi, I decided i needed a night's rest before i could respond to u again(:)).
1. Moving yaya into the box just exposes the defense too much. It just seems far too risky to me.
Also yaya has to come a long way. where would u have him start moving in from. (i) when Alves has the ball?
this wouldn't give him enough time unless Alves has a defender to beat and this would nullify the effect of messi's movement to make space for Alves and also leave Alves too much work.
(ii). When xavi has the ball? then yaya's movement would leave Xavi exposed with possession with no one to cover behind him.
2. i think we need some Stigsby stats on the effectiveness of long shots. but the point is long shots are a part of the game so its not like there r no long shots at all from Barca during a game. Agreed that the point is not possession but giving up possession more often endangers the defense. As we saw against Madrid a few lateral passes(which will do little to decelerate the counter) and the right flank can be exposed. Your Hammer and Anvil theory was enlightening but don't u see that on a break from deeper up the field we are left with both hammers and anvil chasing behind the ball rather than wedging midfielders b/w them. Possession is an important part of the Barca game and with a higher defense (i think moving the defense further up the field is partly what has made it more effective this yr) it becomes important to minimise loss of possession. It might also be as complicated for us to switch b/w the different setups and safegaurd the defense as it is for the oppostion. A minutely detailed transition and means of covering will be necessary.
coming back to crossing i have a 6-yr old memory (it may be hazy and horribly flawed but at the moment this is how i recall things) of 2002 WC where Argentina used Ortega and lopez on the flanks. They routinely got past the defenders to put in crosses but each time with a packed box it was easy for both Sweden and England to position defenders so that the cross was headed out before it got to the near post.
Crosses are most effective in fast paced less-congested games where u have defenders n strikers facing the same way(towards goal). similarly long shots are most effective during a weak transition into defense and mostly when u are up against defenders(who are generally slower n tend to back off and hold position). That means it involves either getting past the midfield or finding a large space in the midfield.

kamikaze kontiki said...

So wat do i think we should do ?
conventionally teams try to create space by drawing the midfield out upto the halfway line. But we are talking about a situation where that is not likely to happen. However, i think its possible to draw the midfield out say 5-10 metres through a forward and lefward movement.
This can be achieved by an initial concentration of the attack on the left flank and the withdrawal of Xavi towards a more holding position. The desired result is penetration leading to a goal and to achieve that we need one or two direct and definite points of attack. But we have Messi and to a lesser extent Eto'o. The key would be to create space for them in the centre i.e draw the midfield away.
Messi would then provide the dagger thrust like no one else in the world can.
By increasing the threat and stretching the defense on the left we spread the defense out. Then Xavi in a more withdrawn position can effect the fast transition through to Messi, Eto'o or Alves on the right flank.And make no mistake there is no one in the world better than xavi in doing the job of attracting players towards himself while still finding a way to make the killer pass. yaya is necessary to provide him with cover. The 3rd midfielder provides both a diversion and a penetration option (like in the Luis enrique days). i understand that this is demanding a lot of the players as they have to be at their best and most skillful a larger portion of the time but if u want to break through a 8-9 man defense it is gonna be hard.

Ramzi said...

We won a CL without Yaya and with Xavi in the pivot position, so Teams having at least 8 guys in the last third of the field is not a threat on counter when you have Xavi, Puyol, Marquez and Abidal behind, specially if the opponent player no pure striker or only one striker(which is the case most of the time so what usually happen is that one Defender mark the striker, the other one create depth and the third (call him Marquez) push little forward to become almost beside Xavi, this is Barcelona, not Chelsea, and thats the mentality we play, creating enough cover behind and go forward. We are the team that need the points and in big teams those who get so obsessed by (what if-what if- what if) get sacked the very next month, you dictate the game on your opposition.
regarding the distance covered by players, the game will not be as fast as u think because all what opponent do is slowing down the tempo, so instead of making it a problem for us when we play it turn to become an advantage, beside, the players (like Yaya) are already moving forward when we face 10 men behind the ball, so instead of Yaya moving with no sense forward while Xavi is there, they switch positions.keep in mind the ball movement(right-middle-back-left....)its not like alves will have the ball from valdes and run straight forward with it to the opponent area, if the game would have been that fast we would score already from the first minute:)

The effectiveness of long shots is not only that you score, but it also shake defense and it pull out defense specially that yaya and alves can take attempts even few steps far from the box edge, again, its not like the team will forget everything and just go shooting, this technique is called (tactical phrase) something u apply from time to time during your game or else (as I mentioned in the article) it will be too predictable. At least my last paragraph in the article is a must read to understand my point.
against Madrid Yaya was moving forward and no one was covering behind, and thats what will always happen against defensive teams, Yaya will not stand there watching he will go forward so someone has to cover behind him. that was one of the reasons for writing this article actually.
Argentina in 2002 had too many problems aside crossing for losing in the WC - I follow and like that team- so I am not sure if that factor was that decisive then,but I cant name all the cases when Crosses and Long shots saved the game for the dominant team against a team parked in their own box, because thats too many to mention even during one season.

Against a crowded defense and the ball in your feet you cant penetrate, and you cant pass it on the field to a player inside and the opposition refuse to leave the box even if the ball is with Valdes, I think we need to do something unpredictable that the opposition do not expect and are not trained to face, but we will agree that we don't agree;)

kamikaze kontiki said...

Haha, yeah we ll leave it at that. I understand the need for an alternative when teams are basically going to park the bus but i dont like the idea of Yaya moving forward or setting up long shots. But again i see your point and i also see that there are few alternatives in this situation.

Anonymous said...

"We won a CL with Xavi in the pivot"

That's not true, Ramzi: Edmilson was our guy that season.

Ramzi said...

fcbee, how many games Edmilson played fully fit that season?:)
I feel sorry for the guy i like and I think he has great potentials, but he was so unlucky with injuries, we had him and motta actually for that position, but both had the same curse with injury.

What I meant there was that Xavi as a pivot is not something new or creative i am suggesting, he can play that role temporarily during the game.

Anonymous said...

Edmilson was quite fit that season, I think. He refered to that season as his best because of the lack of injury problems. And if he wasn't fit, it was probably Marquez or Motta who played there, so not Xavi like you suggested... But nevermind, you're allowed to make a mistake every now and then ;)

Good read!

Ramzi said...

yes, he even played the final with Van bomel and deco while Xavi wasn't available
I kind of remembered that while in a meeting at office;)

But still I will stick to the fact that Xavi will not has a problem to fit the Pivot position as a temporary cover for Yaya move forward.

Thanks for the note, we don't want to sell fake goods;)

Waleed said...

Xavi started his career as a DM anyways, thats a fact. he had to go back into this position every time our DM was out, Edmilson on 2006 Yaya 2007.
any DM have arole in offence also an its this role where Xavi supercede Yaya, but defensively Yaya is the man no doubt!

Anonymous said...

I love articles like this. Thanks so much! I learn more from it than from watching 100 games.

Thanks again and a happy new year to you for writing it!

Anonymous said...

As usual excellent article by Ramzi, also quite well explained using the images. However if ramzi or anyone will still read this I would say there are a few things which may be noted:

1. Xavi is NOT good at DM as he cannot tackle well or put a stop to opposition play. Also the season we didn't have a proper DM 06-07 we played Iniesta in that role and not Xavi. Also we had Deco then who was brilliant at stopping the opponent's play with tactical fouls etc. And still we leaked goals.

2. In that respect, Xavi will only provide us with the option of covering space at best when we are on the defence. So a better idea might be to move Xavi on the left flank (not to the extreme...) and move Iniesta in to provide the pivot role. Iniesta's passing/distribution might not be as good as Xavi's but Xavi can certainly cross better than Iniesta and hence create a different danger on the left.
(On a side note VanBommel/Edmilson/Motta/Deco did more defensively during our double season than Xavi and he was never the DM)

3. While ofcourse the crossing & heading, long shots is something we have lacked for years. Pep has improved on this alot with doing quite a bit of what Ramzi has proposed. What Pep has been doing is essentially the first two images without Yaya there near the box. That is because Yaya is put there to reduce the effects of a counter attack. In that sense the risk of a counter attack has been measured and reduced.

And that, is the main change Ramzi is proposing: "to get yaya in and around the box to become another target and latch onto crosses."
Also it may be noted that this is being proposed only in the context of Bus parking teams. i.e. most of the players of the opponent are inside their own penalty area. Hence greatly reducing the risk of a counter itself and with Yaya & Keita upfront it serves only for more pressure at the start of the counter while the threat by the one or two men outside the penalty box is reduced by the three CBs. Undoubtedly this exposes our defence much more but then the threat to them is so little that it is worth it.

4. The one thing that has not been established and proposed by Ramzi is shots from in and around the penalty box. The important thing here is that this tactic is used when we have run out of options and ideas because the opponent has crowded their penalty areas with players. ie no space exist between the lines of our midfield and forwards and hence they are cut off and further there are too many players behind and on our forwards therefore reducing their chances of shooting and scoring greatly.
As said by Ramzi and I am greatly in favour of this, shooting from around the box exposes the opponents to another threat and hence forcing them to come out and meet it, thereby reducing the congestion in the penalty area.
Again, this is only successful if the team is sitting back in the penalty area and not applying pressure on the midfield hence giving them ample time to put shots in. (obviously if the opponent is applying pressure on our midfield it is not crowding the penalty area as much and there is no need for this tactic.)
Possession should not be of much concern here since the penalty area is completely surrounded by our players and they will be infront of the ball if they were to lose it.
Remember, when draw without scoring a goal we still have 60-70% possession but it still gets us only 1 point. It is much better to lose possession in search of more points than to lose points in search of more possession.

Finally I'd like to add that though this tactic might be useful, as of now it is only temporary and real effectiveness in this area will come if we buy players who are more adapted to such roles. ie we should have a true LW can hug the line and put good crosses in the the left flank and a CF who can effectively head and convert crosses. Though these players should only be as options and as back up players and not to replace Eto'o or Iniesta's place in the team.

Ramzi said...

Marry Xmass for all, I am back to net world.

Snyde, when I write this kind of articles - and honestly I like to write this kind more than game previews- I always have a problem that if expressed my point thoroughly, the article gets too long to be read, and if I briefed i may fail to explain the point.

Comments like yours, and the guys who commented and discussed the article here solve that problem for me, I agree totally on what you mentioned that I consider your comment as a -Must Read- attachment to the article.

I like the iniesta vs Xavi Idea, though I am not sure if Iniesta can really switch between three positions for us, I like how versatile he is, but as you know we cant afford losing him as a left wing while we play our normal game, so to add a DM role to his original LW and midfield roles may cause him some confusion, but its really worth considering.

Anonymous said...

Thanks :)

Well you're right in your concern but Iniesta has played that role quite a few times so shouldn't be too much of a problem. Plus this kind of tactic will only be employed if we don't break them in the first hour. So perhaps Xavi and Iniesta can permanently switch positions then?
Even though this seems as highly unbalanced positioning at first, taken into the context that we have 2/3rd of the field to do whatever we want, we can take advantage of that freedom and employ unbalanced tactics since our players will hardly have to do any running back.
Oh and your articles are really great and are what makes this site so much better than any other barca site. (apart from brilliant coverage of everything barca)
We love 'em so keep writing 'em! Merry Xmas!

PS Are you on any forums? Would love to hear your opinions and discuus barca and football in general on a daily basis. :D

Custom Search
 
Custom Search