Saturday 14 March 2009

Europe could approve FIFA's foreign player's limit

source: The Guardian
date: Thursday 26 February 2009
editing: fcbtransfers.blogspot.com






Fifa's plans to limit the number of foreign players do not breach European Union rules, an independent report declared. The 6+5 rule has been overwhelmingly approved by 155 of the organisation's member nations, but dismissed as illegal by the European Commission and most EU governments because they say it amounts to discrimination at work and a restriction on the free movement of workers.

Now the Institute for European Affairs (Inea), commissioned by Fifa to study the issue, claims the idea of restricting foreign players in league games does not fall foul of EU rules on free movement of workers. The Inea chairman, Professor Jürgen Gramke insisted the report, although commissioned by Fifa, was entirely independent. "We took no instructions from Fifa. Inea accepted this commission on condition that our requirements of complete independence were met."

The report says that, under EU law, the "regulatory autonomy" of sporting associations is recognised and supported. "The key aim of the 6+5 rule in the view of the experts is the creation and assurance of sporting competition. The 6+5 rule does not impinge on the core area of the right to freedom of movement.”

Fifa endorsed the rule in May last year, but six months later EU ministers said it clearly broke EU rules. The 6+5 rule established that at the start of each match, a club must field at least six players who would be eligible for the national team of the country of the club. But there would be no limit on substitutes and no limit on the number of non-national players that clubs can sign.

Today's report says that, at worst, the 6+5 rule could constitute "indirect discrimination" because "it is not directly based on the nationality of professional players". Instead it "merely considers entitlement to play for the national team concerned, and any possible indirect discrimination can be defended on the basis of compelling reasons of general interest".

Quota systems and rules limiting foreign players in football were outlawed in the Bosman case in 1995. The Bosman judgment had a dramatic effect on football, said today's report, opening up the use of foreign players to such a degree that up to 56% of national league players are now not eligible to play for the national team of the league in which they play. In addition, up to half of the foreign players are non-European. This development discourages young indigenous footballing talent, because clubs can recruit fully trained players from elsewhere, often cheaper, the report points out.

It says the central aim of the 6+5 rule is to generate and safeguard sporting competition. Gramke said the report's conclusions justifying the compatibility of the 6+5 rule with EU law also applied to other team sports such as handball, basketball and ice hockey.

The findings will bolster Fifa's challenge to the European Commission and governments to recognise the 6+5 rule. A Fifa spokesman said the report would form the basis of fresh talks with commission officials, including the employment commissioner, Vladimir Spidla. The Fifa president, Sepp Blatter, is determined to see the 6+5 rule in place by the start of the 2012-13 season and the commission is currently equally determined to block him.


read the full and original article here


Editor's Notes:

Timetable for Implementation
1. 4+7 for 2010-201
2. 5+6 for 2011-2012
3. 6+5 for 2012-2013

The Bosman Ruling interprets Article 39 of the treaty of the European Community to mean that no institutional impediment be applied such that the free movement of persons belonging to the member states for the purpose of employment within the European Union is restricted or causes direct discrimination on the basis of nationality.

The Inea report sites the wording of the 6+5 rule which mentions eligibility to qualification for the national team of the respective league and terms it as “at most indirect discrimination”. Further it points out that Fifa is an autonomous federation formed with the fundamental freedom of association and this in principle justifies its right to restrict market freedoms within its domain.

Read another article on the issue:
Ian Lynam: FIFA's 6+5 Proposal


Read more:
Barça B: Gai will get Spanish nationality soon
English and Italian clubs monitoring Barça youth
Proposal to limit spending on transfers and salaries

15 comments:

Dan R said...

This is a must.
It cannot be that Liverpool will have more spaniards than half of La Liga teams!

Anonymous said...

I think it's nonsense...It's professional football, not national football...I agree you 'should' feature plenty homegrown players but not all are or should have to go the route of say Atletic Bilbao.

Aeneas said...

I do not see this working..
What happens when 2 or 3 homegrown players are injured?

Anonymous said...

erm eto'o is classified as home grown due to be trained in madrid since a young age..i.e messi ....:/ lolol the guardian fucked that up..

Anonymous said...

this is bullshit. i'm all for the free movement of labor & i can not see how this does not directly violoate that.

i like seeing homegrown players in teams & spanish players in spanish clubs but to mandate that is absolutely ridiculous. deciding whether and how many foreign players a club can have should be left to the CLUB. not a foreign body.

this is just a reflection of how interrelated the world's economies really are whether you like it or not(if you haven't grasped this by now). i'm sick of all this protectionist bullshit going around. isolating ones economy from trading with others does not benefit anyone. it may create jobs locally in the short term but in the long run this is a horrible horrible idea.

http://www.economist.com/opinion/displaystory.cfm?story_id=13061443

Anonymous said...

if this is not implemented.. all the big guns are just gonna buy there way to glory.. if they see someone they like, they're gonna buy them, as easy as that... like man u and chelsea... that's why the premier league has only 4 contenders and la liga has only 2, us and madrid...

Anonymous said...

Why is messi highlighted? does he count as home grown?

Anonymous said...

I was thinking the same thing... a club must field at least six players who would be eligible for the national team of the country of the club... since Messi has chosen to represent Argentina, he would not be eligible for the Spanish National Team regardless of whether or not he had Spanish citizenship... how would that work? I guess he couln't be included as one of the six.

Anonymous said...

i kinda agree with this rule.every team should invest in their youth system and try to bring homegrown players to the first squad.money isnt everything
in greece where i live there are teams with 11 foreighn players,although there are youth academies everywhere that produce great talents ,noone is looking at them,they just buy trash players from other european teams because they played there and they dont give a chance to youth greek players.
the same can be said for other leagues too.sure it will hit the big teams but it will be a good thing for world football.

Anonymous said...

im neutral here. but if this rule really comes out, EPL club will have a huge blow, and la liga, and BARCA will still be strong.. we got a lot of talent from homegrown players.

Anonymous said...

yes leo10 messi has been in barcelona since he was 13. he signed his first professional contract with barcelona therefore he is home grown. Pique and cesc would also be home-grown players for barca i believe. Gai should be a home grown player as well along with icardi and jeffren

Anonymous said...

I all honesty i am against this rule. While clubs should invest in young players from their region, let me just say that this rule will kill football as we know it. No more samuel etoo, no more leo messi. Let me explain why. If you are a club, why would you invest in foreign players that cant play for your club? The knock on result is that a player like leo messi that could not play football without his medical bill being payed would never have gotten the attention required in argentina and would not be a footballer.

Now i will be honest with you, i am from trinidad and we do not have the resources to develop players such as yorke and kenwyne jones. The result of 6+5 is that players such as these never get the training and develoment in england that was so crucial to them becoming the players that they became. We will not see players such as these because trinidad's football league cannot play any significant amount. You will see players turning towards other sports such as basketball, cricket where they would be able to make more money than if they played football under the 6+5 rule. Players and national teams from africa and the caribbean region will suffer greatly under this rule.

People do not settle for second class products. The standard of football in europe will drop dramatically if you remove the foreign players (would gerrard be as great if he wasnt playing against essien,ronaldo and cesc? would essien be as good if he wasnt training every day with drogba,lampard and terry? would iniesta be as good if he had not trained with etoo, deco and ronaldinho?), a falling standard in these league's coupled with the non-development of great african talents such as drogba,etoo,essien etc will lead to a dramatic fall in the standard of world football and the world cup will feel the effect and become of a lower standard. Ratings will fall and blatter and co will be running around like crazy people trying to figure out what to do to fix the mess that they have created.

This rule will also cause a mass exodus of footballer from europe by 2013 and will cause many players from africa asia south america and the caribbean to lose their jobs and their potential to earn money. Which club will keep 10"foreign" players at their club when they can only play 5? They will keep 6 maybe or 7 because as somebody rightly pointed out, what happens when 3 of your local players get injured? You must have 3 more to put in. In this way man utd will shed players like anderson, nani and manucho who through no fault of their own will suddenly find themselves unable to get work in europe since nobody is hiring and. So in effect what you are telling these players is, you have to stay in brazil/angola and stay poor all of your life.

Finally blatter is attempting to do this because he finds european football has gotten too popular. He wants the world cup to be the only place that you can see messi vs ronaldo or robinho vs robben and so boost ratings. He will kill world football if this crazy plan that he is trying to push goes through. The world is supposed to be moving closer together, not further apart. Maybe it is time some change came to fifa as well and these old men who cannot understand that the world today is diffferent from the world 30 years ago.

Anonymous said...

Kill football? Football is practicaly dead as is.

Anonymous said...

Trust me, you will be screaming for football as it is now if fifa implement this 6+5 rule. Viewership in the prem and other european leagues will drop because they no longer have the best players, the standard of world football will drop because the coaching and development of players from around the world in the european leagues will cease.

Anonymous said...

I really don't get you. Do you really want all the best players in the world to be in ~10 clubs? Because of it, the top 3 leagues are incredibly boring to watch. You have Barcelona and Real in Spain, ManU and Chelsea in England, and only Inter in Italy. If you find it entertaining to watch the same teams fighting it out year after year after year, fine, but some of us are tired of it.

The level of football played by the best teams would drop, yes, but we would gain so much more with the 6+5 rule than we'd lose.

Custom Search
 
Custom Search